CVE-2026-41666: Implicit Signed Unsigned Comparison Overflow
Implicitly comparing a signed integer with a size division (like `SIZE_MAX / element_size`) can lead to signedness/promotion mismatches on mixed-bit architectures (e.g., 32-bit `size_t` vs 64-bit signed int). This can unexpectedly evaluate to false and bypass memory allocation overflow checks. Explicitly cast the signed integer to an unsigned 64-bit type (e.
C++greprules fetch cve-2026-41666-implicit-signed-unsigned-comparison-overflow --engine opengrepDescription
Implicitly comparing a signed integer with a size division (like `SIZE_MAX / element_size`) can lead to signedness/promotion mismatches on mixed-bit architectures (e.g., 32-bit `size_t` vs 64-bit signed int). This can unexpectedly evaluate to false and bypass memory allocation overflow checks. Explicitly cast the signed integer to an unsigned 64-bit type (e.
Community feedback
0 rule-level signals from signed-in users.
- Useful reports
- 0
- Context false positives
- 0
- Metadata suggestions
- 0
Contextual precision
Aggregated from approved scan feedback. False-positive reports describe observed scan contexts, not a global rule verdict.
- Findings observed
- 0
- Projects
- 0
- Reporters
- 0
Precision details are collecting more signed-in reports before verdict counts or ratios are emphasized.
No approved finding verdicts yet.
No scan diagnostics reported yet.